A 26-point charge-sheet has been sent to the governor laying out claimed budgetary and regulatory abnormalities of Punjab University (PU) Vice-Chancellor (VC), Dr. Zafar Mueen Nasir, as per a report by a private media outlet.
The Punjab Higher Education Department (HED) arranged the charge-sheet and chose to explore the money related and managerial anomalies professedly dedicated by Dr. Nasir.
The archive had been sent to Punjab Governor, who is likewise the Chancellor of the Punjab University, for his endorsement to allude the case to Chief Minister’s Inspection Team (CMIT) for an examination.
As indicated by authorities at the varsity, who asked for secrecy, the HED said different “illicit” steps taken by the PU VC and furthermore suggested that Dr. Nasir was ineligible for the post of the VC. He was shortlisted and along these lines delegated as temporary VC by the Lahore High Court (LHC).
In the outline, as per authorities, the office had connected narrative proof. Sources said that the real assertions against the PU VC incorporated an honor of common works contract worth Rs20 million without following customs. For this situation, PU’s earlier acting Chief Engineer Faizul Hasan Sipra had presented a composed proclamation before a request board that the PU VC verbally requested him to play out the common works.
The letter additionally said the arrangement of Dr. Muhammad Awais as senior member staff of wellbeing sciences without the endorsement of the chancellor and further expressed that projects of Allied Health Science had begun without the endorsement from important gatherings.
The HED additionally raised a complaint to the arrangement of acting treasurer and acting enlistment center by Dr. Nasir, without the endorsement of the Chancellor. The sources said that the division likewise suggested examinations concerning a few arrangements by Dr. Nasir in grades 19, 20 and 21 and affirmed illicit arrangement of Institute of Geology chief.
Moreover, a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to set up the Dubai grounds of the varsity, without the endorsement of the able expert, ought to likewise be researched. The HED scrutinized the restoration of a rejected worker of PU and his arrangement in Punjab University Employees Housing Society.